Harlan Ellison is well known for being . . . forthright.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mj5IV23g-fE
(via WritersWeekly)
His point of view is a valid one, but it's also a little dated in this age of new media. For all his maverick bluster Ellison is an established writer who got where he is today by traditional methods. Those methods have become less appropriate now that so much free stuff is available.
New writers ('underpublished' writers, as Evo Terra of Podiobooks.com calls them) would do well to explore the alternatives. Slavishly insisting that every word carries a price-tag can be counterproductive. In essence Ellison is right, but it's worth remembering that writers can receive 'value' for their work in other than money.
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
Sunday, 7 September 2008
Burnee links for Sunday

Legal bid to stop CERN atom smasher from 'destroying the world' - Telegraph
The “Carl Sagan Institute”… of Ufology! | forgetomori
mediawatchwatch.org.uk » The unkindest cut?
Pharyngula: Palinanity
Pharyngula: Didgeridoos are not for you, little girl
Polly Toynbee: Faith schools may be Blair's most damaging legacy | Comment is free | The Guardian
The Associated Press: McCain fought money on teen pregnancy programs
Skepchick: Fine, I’ll say it then…
"Sarah Palin has been John McCain’s running mate for less than a week now and I’m already so sick of her I want to punch my TV. I feel like I know more about her and her family than I do about my own family. I certainly know more about her than I do about any of my neighbors. What I find most annoying though, is how much coverage is being given to a question that no one even asked:The Freethinker › Heaven’s full of people who were never born
How can Sarah Palin shirk her womanly mommy duties to run for VP?"
An Open Letter to Gov. Sarah Palin on Women's Rights | Reproductive Justice and Gender | AlterNet
Sue Blackmore: Those who teach our children science have a duty to reveal the workings of nature | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
Babies, acupuncture and the secret to a good night's sleep - Sydney Morning Herald
Autism and Vaccines: Why Bad Logic Trumps Science | LiveScience
David Bradnack: Face to faith | Comment is free | The Guardian
The Christian creed is full of bad science that makes it a religion of deception, argues David Bradnack
Labels:
Burnee links
Thursday, 4 September 2008
Professor Brian Cox on the Large Hadron Collider, Moon Hoaxers and Intelligent Design

Next week's Radio Times has an interview with Professor Brian Cox, who has no patience with conspiracy theorists:
Radio Times:
"Cern is being sued in the US over the possible dangers of turning on the LHC, such as creating a mini black hole that might swallow the planet. Could it be the end of everything?"Brian Cox:
"The nonsense you find on the web about 'doomsday scenarios' is conspiracy theory rubbish generated by a small group of nutters, primarily on the other side of the Atlantic. These people also think that the Theory of Relativity is a Jewish conspiracy and that America didn't land on the Moon. Both are more likely, by the way, than the LHC destroying the world. I'm slightly irritated, because this non-story is symptomatic of a larger mistrust in science, particularly in the US, which includes things like intelligent design."Radio Times:
"One final question: how can you be certain? We've heard of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - does it mean you can't be sure of anything?"Brian Cox:
"The Uncertainty Principle is part of quantum mechanics, and the whole subject is based on that. So it affects every result at LHC, but it doesn't affect the conclusion that anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a t**t."
Posted by
Paul S. Jenkins
at
20:30
Professor Brian Cox on the Large Hadron Collider, Moon Hoaxers and Intelligent Design
2008-09-04T20:30:00+01:00
Paul S. Jenkins
black hole|Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle|Intelligent Design|Large Hadron Collider|LHC|Moon hoax|Professor Brian Cox|Radio Times|relativity|
Comments


Sunday, 31 August 2008
YouTube 4 U
For your entertainment and contemplation, Edward Current and Pat Condell:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnjfxCp92pc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIq7tsVvEoY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnjfxCp92pc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIq7tsVvEoY
Posted by
Paul S. Jenkins
at
16:07
YouTube 4 U
2008-08-31T16:07:00+01:00
Paul S. Jenkins
Christianity|Edward Current|God|Islam|Pat Condell|YouTube|
Comments


Labels:
Christianity,
Edward Current,
God,
Islam,
Pat Condell,
YouTube
Burnee links for Sunday

Religion and its mortifying history of self-inflicted pain | A.C. Grayling - Times Online
McCain's VP Wants Creationism Taught in School | Wired Science from Wired.com
Theocratic Sect Prays for Real Armageddon | | AlterNet
Review: Self-help books roundup | Books | The Observer
Mark Vernon: Face to faith | Comment is free | The Guardian
"Humanism is more part of an enlightened, liberal tradition than mere atheism"The art of darkness: Sir Antony Sher - Times Online
Faith Central - Times Online - WBLG: Buffy the Vampire Slayer and women leaving the Church
Women preachers at moderate mosque ‘urge faithful to kill gays’ -Times Online
BBC NEWS | Education | New pressure over faith schools
BBC NEWS | Magazine | The malign power of platitudes
Posted by
Paul S. Jenkins
at
12:00
Burnee links for Sunday
2008-08-31T12:00:00+01:00
Paul S. Jenkins
Burnee links|
Comments


Labels:
Burnee links
Wednesday, 27 August 2008
With God on Our Side - BBC Radio 4

From the Archive Hour website (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/archivehour):
With God on Our SideThe audio can be streamed for about a week here:
Saturday 23 August 2008 20:00-21:00 (Radio 4 FM)
Amid the horrors of war, what makes one man turn to God and another to atheism? Former Bishop of Edinburgh Richard Holloway explores what happens to faith when one's life is on the line.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00d1yqx

http://rapidshare.com/files/341849659/ArchiveHour_WithGodOnOurSide_BBCR4i-20080823.mp3
Monday, 25 August 2008
Atheism is not a religion
Today by a fairly roundabout route I chanced upon this video excerpt, which is a good outline of my own position:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs3RKZjSzYg
"Matt Dillahunty responds to the claim that people need as much faith to NOT believe in god, as to believe in god."
(via: 1 2 3 Religious Comics)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs3RKZjSzYg
"Matt Dillahunty responds to the claim that people need as much faith to NOT believe in god, as to believe in god."
This is from The Atheist Experience, at http://www.atheist-experience.com/, which I'm surprised not to have come across before now.
(via: 1 2 3 Religious Comics)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)