Pages

▼
Showing posts with label arguments for God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label arguments for God. Show all posts
Monday, 8 June 2015

Losing the will to review: Evidence Unseen or Arguments Unconsidered?

›
When I announced this book review project in September last year I made a proviso about reviewing James M. Rochford's Evidence Unsee...
Monday, 7 October 2013

God's not dead, he just doesn't believe in confirmation bias

›
Last night I got caught up with the latest Unbelievable? podcast . It was billed as "Evidence, atheism and the case for God" fe...
Sunday, 6 October 2013

Krauss and Craig in Australia

›
When I heard that Lawrence Krauss was going to debate William Lane Craig again, I was confused. Why would Krauss agree to this, given what...
Sunday, 4 August 2013

My Kalām Krash

›
Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence. The Universe began to exist. Therefore the Universe has a cause of its ex...
Tuesday, 9 October 2012

The ontobollocksical argument is not one of my favourites

›
A link to BBC Radio 4's In Our Time was posted in the Unbelievable? Facebook group , as it dealt with the Ontological Argument for t...
Sunday, 5 August 2012

I waste my time for you — Debate: Does God Exist?

›
This isn't the first time I've live-commented on Facebook while watching or listening to some online media or other. In line with m...
Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Judas: the ultimate betrayal of Dembski and Licona

›
So we come to the end, the final chapter, the ultimate culmination, the concluding, cogent case for the existence of God. At least, that...
Sunday, 13 May 2012

Biblical fan-fiction — not to be taken as gospel

›
In the same vein as Craig L. Blomberg in the previous chapter, Charles L. Quarles asks "What Should We Think About the Gospel of Pete...
Sunday, 29 April 2012

New Testament canon — a boat that must not be rocked

›
Craig L. Blomberg continues his exposition of scriptural arbitrariness with "What Should We Think About the Coptic Gospel of Thomas ?...
Sunday, 15 April 2012

An arbitrary collection of texts becomes "canonical"

›
The New Testament is a collection of books written at different times by apparently different people. (As such, by modern literary definit...
Tuesday, 10 April 2012

An unreliable assessment of the reliability of the Gospels

›
In Craig L. Blomberg 's "The Historical Reliability of the Gospels" — chapter 46 of Dembski & Licona 's Evidence for ...
Monday, 9 April 2012

As far as the Bible is confirmed as true, it is mundane

›
"Archaeology and the Bible — How Archaeological Findings Have Enhanced the Credibility of the Bible" is chapter 45 of Dembski ...
Saturday, 31 March 2012

Textual transubstantiation

›
"Why All the Translations?" is the question Denny Burk asks in the title of chapter 44 of Dembski & Licona 's Evidence f...